Monthly Archives: October 2011

Interview with script consultant Linda Seger

One of the many delights of the St. John’s International Women’s Festival was the opportunity to spend time with Linda Seger, script consultant and author of numerous books on my reference shelf on script writing, adaptation and character development.

I took the opportunity to do a short interview with Linda on her process of reading scripts.

What are you looking for when you read a script?

Focus. I’m reading to see what this story is really about. At times, writers feel a need to fill their scripts with too many issues, characters and themes and it is difficult to grasp the essence of the script. When that happens, I look to the climax of the script. The focus should be there.

I also am looking for the best scenes of the script. That gives me a very clear idea of what the writer is capable of. There’s no sense using an Academy Award winner as a model if the writer hasn’t got the chops at this time. I use the best scenes as the way to encourage a writer.

I have had situations where the writer disagrees about the best scenes. One time I read the first three pages of a script and they were some of the best comedy writing I had ever come across. However, the writer veered away from that wonderful humour and went to some dark places which is where she wanted to focus. I found that part of the script less original, but that’s what she wanted, so my job was to focus on her desire.

I am also of course looking for structure-making sure that there are arcs, acts and scenes that make sense to the overall theme of the script.

I’ve read that if a script doesn’t sing in the first 15 pages, it is in trouble.

That is certainly true in a finished film. But as a script consultant, I’m looking for wherever the script works. If it doesn’t work until the last 10 pages, then I’ll try and pull everything up to that level. Sometimes writers don’t really start soaring until well into the script. Often the beginning, in early drafts, is filled with a very long set up and so we have to address that.

Certainly,the context of the world needs to be clear from the outset of the piece. For instance, in Romero about the Latin American priest, the producer presumed we knew about the priest and what he had accomplished. Some of my work included using the first 5-10 pages to establish the character and place him in a context so there wouldn’t be confusion for the rest of the film.

What is the one lesson writers can learn?

Probably that script writing is both a craft and an art. There’s a mistaken belief that if you take one script writing class, you are ready to write a script. Writing is a very complex process – like dancing or any art form that has technique you need to master. Learning all about the craft – structure, images, and integrating scenes is the most crucial part of being a script writer. However, you need to move on from craft to art and that requires going deeper into the character, the themes and images. You have to keep writing to find your individual voice.

How do you suggest people go deeper into character?

Observe people. Have a journal where you jot down characteristics of people you see anywhere, your family members, or outrageous characters that you meet in your daily life. Real people provide you with the material for the many details that make characters in scripts fascinating.

What are your favourite films?

I think of Amadeus and Shindler’s List as the big gems and Stand by Me as the little gem. I’m always looking for films which go deeper both in theme and character. I also admire Witness since I have a personal connection to the people who wrote it. As well, my husband sort of proposed to me in the barn-raising scene, so it is very special to me.

Linda Seger is the author of 12 books, 9 on screenwriting, and has given seminars in 32 countries around the world and consulted on over 2000 scripts.

The Creative Process

Just back from the St. John’s International Women’s Festival and seeing all kinds of films sparked thoughts on knowing your creative process.

One of the films was Koop, a documentary on Winnipeg artist Wanda Koop.
film-clips

The film makers took her on a boat in the St. Lawrence where she could sketch impressions for her large landscape pieces. In watching the film, I was reminded of the four stages (perhaps not quite as linear) of the creative process – the prep, the incubation process, illumination and verification.

The documentary showed Koop preparing to go on the trip -her hesitation about leaving her cat and the instructions she needed to be on the ship.

Being on the boat gives her plenty of incubation time and space to draw impressions of the land along the St. Lawrence. And then there is one scene where you can see it on her face, she’s ready to begin the process of committing her vision onto the canvas.

That illumination isn’t without its doubts. Although she’s an accomplished artist, she still feels overwhelmed at the beginning and has doubts about her abilities to bring her vision to fruition. Those expressions of doubt are what we all need to work through to create.

We need time time we feel we own and the space to create. Comedian, John Cleese emphasizes the importance of drawing boundaries so that you can be creative.

Cleese on Creativity

St. John’s International Women’s Festival

I’m here at the wonderful St. John’s International Women’s Festival facilitating a pitching workshop, along with Roberta Munroe on short films and Linda Seger who wrote How to Make a Good Script Great and the Art of Adaptation.

I feel very fortunate to be here and here are some of my initial impressions.

The importance of a supportive artistic and creative community. Here in St. John’s, the community really turned out to see the premiere of Beatdown, the debut feature of Deanne Foley, a wonderful underdog story of a young girl who’s heart’s desire is to be a wrestler. It was funny and really created a unique world in the film of small town Newfoundland.

It really does take a village to create. The amount of collaboration necessary to execute any creative film or tv project is always astounding to me. The list of people to thank is endless.

2. The importance of beginnings, middles, and ends in storytelling for me and how crucial structure is.  I’m a firm believer in structure sets you free. For instance, a three act structure for any form of content gives a roadmap. It is so important for me as the viewer to have those cues so that I know what to expect in watching. For me, it helps me connect on an emotional level.

I guess that ‘s the difference between art and storytelling.

Some of my inspiration

When I’m working at my desk, there are times that I get distracted. I’m fortunate to live in a beautiful spot where I can look out my window and see the ocean-absolutely wonderful but it can contribute to my procrastination.

So when I need to keep my head down, I also take inspiration from having images of artists or mementos from events I’ve attended on my desk.

The artist, Louise Bourgeois is one of my favourites. She died last year at 98 and was still creating up to her death. Her motivation to create was fueled by a traumatic incident that occurred in her childhood and she gave those emotions physical forms in her sculptures and art.

I had the good fortune to be at the opening of the Tate Modern in London (one of my favourite places to view art) where her sculptures  were in the Turbine Hall. I loved being able to climb up on the three towers and discuss their meaning with perfect strangers.

I Do I Undo I Redo, Louise Bourgeois Photo: Martin Godwin

I love this sentiment…

The giant sculpture Maman, by Louise Bourgeois at the front of the National Gallery in Ottawa.

Who inspires you?

Wanted – Women and Social Entrepreneurs

Last night I had the pleasure of going to the Entrepreneur Awards. it was incredibly inspiring to hear how people had boot strapped their way from their garages or tables in coffee shops into large scale businesses. Some of the entrepreneurs had come from other countries and it was heartening to hear them speak about what Canada meant to their success. Very touching. Courage to push beyond the naysayers and negativity were present in so many of their stories.

It was a great evening except for a couple of observations. There was only one woman who had been nominated. The rest of the finalists were all men – it was a sea of suits, except for two guys – one in a flashy white tuxedo jacket (very cool) and one dressed in a traditional brightly coloured Indian coat. I realize that the nominations were open to all – that women weren’t excluded but it is shocking still to see a stage filled with only men talking about their achievements – wonderful as they all were.

My second rant – there was a separate category for social entrepreneurship as if improving conditions socially, environmentally and educationally was somehow different from running a profitable business. Surely we’ve come to a time when all businesses need to be conscious of the world beyond their bottom lines – that where they do business, how they do business and what they do in their business is as important as how much money they make.

Next year, I’m making it my mission to nominate as many women as possible. And make social entrepreneurship just part of the criteria in judging the winners. Care to join me?